BM0215-189-1 was advanced to a replicated preliminary yield test at Brandon in 2007 where it was evaluated for the same traits as the previous year plus hull peeling of the malt, advanced malting quality analyses (i.e., same traits as for preliminary analyses plus friability and wort viscosity), and reaction to loose smut, covered smut, false loose smut ( U. They were also evaluated in field disease nurseries for reactions to spot blotch at Brandon and the Crop Development Centre (CDC), University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon spot blotch and net blotch at AAFC, Melfort, SK stem rust ( Puccinia graminis Pers.) at Brandon and the CRC, Winnipeg and to fusarium head blight (FHB) incited by Fusarium graminearum Schwabe on a 0–5 scale based on visual symptoms in the irrigated FHB nursery at Brandon (Legge et al. In addition to the earlier selection criteria, lines were selected based on yield, heading date, kernel plumpness, test weight, kernel weight, kernel brightness (rated visually on 1–5 scale), hull peeling, and preliminary malting quality analyses (i.e., grain protein concentration, alpha amylase activity, diastatic power, fine grind extract, soluble protein concentration, and ratio of soluble to total protein concentration) conducted at the CRC, Winnipeg, MB. The selected F 6 lines, one of which was BM0215-189-1, were grown as single plots in a preliminary yield test with repeated checks at Brandon in 2006. Of these, 13 lines were selected on the basis of height, maturity, lodging resistance, general appearance, and field disease reaction with spot blotch being the predominant disease. Based on spot blotch resistance and agronomic appearance, 52 lines were selected and grown as F 5 progeny rows in the field at Brandon in 2005. The harvested seeds from each spike were planted as a single F 4 hill plot in the irrigated field leaf disease nursery at Brandon in 2004 where spot blotch was the predominant disease. Based on agronomic appearance and foliar disease resistance, the population was selected for further evaluation with 525 spikes harvested and threshed individually. The F 3 generation was grown in two bulk plots in a randomized test in the field at Brandon in 2003. The F 1 generation was grown as a bulk in the field at Brandon in 2002, and the F 2 generation as a bulk increase in the 2002–2003 winter nursery at Southern Seeds Technology, Leeston, New Zealand. Early generations were handled by a modified bulk method. Newdale is a two-row malting barley cultivar that showed a significant advance in grain yield when it was in the registration tests (Legge et al. of Sask., and ND7556 was a breeding line with spot blotch resistance from North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND. TR234 was developed from the cross Ellice/S7729//ND7556, where S7729 is a breeding line from the Univ. TR236 was selected for net blotch resistance ( Pyrenophora teres Drechs.) from the cross Wpg-1//AC Oxbow/Manley, where Wpg-1 is another breeding line from the CRC with the pedigree SM80489/CI9214. TR238 was developed from the cross Wpg843-234/Manley//AC Oxbow/Manley, where Wpg843-234 was a breeding line developed by the AAFC Cereal Research Centre (CRC), Winnipeg, MB, from the cross Ellice (Metcalfe 1987)/SM80489 with SM80489 being a breeding line from the University of Saskatchewan (University of Sask.), Saskatoon, SK. TR02267 is an advanced breeding line from the Brandon Research Centre with the pedigree TR253/AC Metcalfe (Legge et al. 2008) made in 2002 in the greenhouse at the AAFC Brandon Research Centre, Brandon, MB. AAC Synergy was developed from the cross TR02267/Newdale (Legge et al.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |